Rational Choice, Democratic Institution, and “Heresthetics”: A Review and Appraisal of William H. Riker’s Theory of Modern Political Economy
Author: Don-Yun Chen, Samuel S. G. Wu
Abstract / Chinese PDF Download
William Harrison Riker (1920-1993) is one of the founding fathers of modernpolitical science. Recent calling for “Perestroika” in the American Political ScienceAssociation has demonstrated the dominant but controversial role played by therational choice school in the academia. As a result, it is urgent for Taiwan’s politicalscientists to know more about this school.First, we try to understand the origin and development of this important schoolby reviewing William H. Riker’s research agenda retrospectively. By focusing onrational choice, democratic institution and “heresthetics,” we discuss the content,significance, and implications of these three focuses as the hardcore of the rationalchoice school’s research agenda. Second, we find that these research focuses can beinterpreted as three strategies of competing, ignoring and synthesizing, adopted bythe school to gain its success in the academia. Lastly, we conclude with suggestionsfor applying the rational choice theory to the study of politics in Taiwan.Regardless of its controversial advancement in political science, RCT hasbecome one of the important alternative approaches in contemporary politicalresearch. For its future development in Taiwan’s academia, we need to have a basic understanding of its past. There is an important local purpose by reviewing Riker’scareer contributions through concepts such as positive political theory, newinstitutionalism, and economic studies of politics. In the past, the RCT in Taiwan’spolitical research is under the condition of “imported pseudo-dialogue,” i.e., manycriticisms but very few substantive researches. This article can be a meaningfulbeginning of applying RCT in Taiwanese political researches in the future.