Comparison and Evaluation of Divided and Unified Government in the United States
Author: Chung-li Wu
Abstract / Chinese PDF Download
Since 1968, the phenomenon of divided government at the federal and local levels in the United States has come to seem normal. This study concentrates on both the causes and consequences of divided and unified government. Concerning the causes of divided government, researchers developed some distinct approaches to the study of split-ticket voting behavior, but none of them provided a comprehensive explanation. In addition to summarizing the strengths and weaknesses of distinct approaches, this study offers a synthetic interpretation of the causes of divided government. Just as not knowing the causes of divided government, the question about the consequences of divided government – does gridlock arise under divided government? – remains contentious. By analyzing the dual dimensions of government institution and party structure, I conclude that divided government does not necessarily produce gridlock in either policy or process. This essay also judges how far these political scientists take us toward a theory that explicates the causes and consequences of divided government, and these questions can be viewed as an opportunity to develop and test further theories of American politics. In conclusion, I try to make predictions about the plausible development of divided government in Taiwan.